AMBIGUITY IN THE OSCE MINSK GROUP DOCUMENTS (ON THE EXAMPLE OF NAGORNО-KARABAGH CONFLICT)

Abstract

Ambiguity in diplomatic discourse constitutes a significant linguistic strategy, allowing diplomats to manage the complexities and sensitivities of international relations. Linguistically, ambiguity involves the use of words or expressions with multiple meanings or interpretations, allowing diplomats to maintain flexibility and avoid confrontation. However, while ambiguity fosters constructive relationships among countries, the potential for multiple interpretations can also lead to misunderstandings.

This study investigates the role of ambiguity in diplomatic discourse, particularly the use of ambiguity as a phenomenon in statements issued by the ՕSСЕ Мinsk Grօup on the Nаgоrnо-Kаrаbаkh Conflict, to see how different types of ambiguity (lexical, syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic) are utilized in those statements and how they functioned. In conclusion, the use of ambiguous language, initially intended to maintain dialogue and avoid intensifying tensions, can also lead to multiple interpretations particularly perceptions of bias or insufficient support.